Home | | Support Us | Contact Us

Help Farmers with Quality GE Seeds

C Kameswara Rao


Govts can work with existing consumer protection laws to ensure productivity of GE crop.

Currently, pest resistant Bt cotton is the only commercialised genetically engineered (GE) crop in India. Hybrids with the single bacterial gene Cry 1Ac (mostly Bollgard I of Monsanto) predominate, although there is a small volume of Bollgard II, the hybrids with two staked bacterial genes, Cry 1Ac and Cry 1Ab, that are grown in some zones.

Commercialisation of Bt cotton brought to the fore a number of difficulties the farmers face in the matter of seed, of both GE and non-GE crops. When more GE crops become commercialised the situation would worsen. Governmental intervention and the cooperation of the seed industry are needed to safeguard farmers’ interests.
The Indian Seeds Act, 1966 regulates only notified varieties but seed certification by governmental agencies is merely optional. There is a comprehensive Seeds Bill, 2004 which provides for registration, certification and seed testing, regulated by a Central and several State Committees.

Under the Seed Bill, 2004, a GE variety, cleared by the Indian regulatory authority for commercialisation would have to be registered. GE crop varieties involving ‘Genetic Use Restriction Technology and Terminator Technology’ are prohibited. Certification of registered seed for quality and reliability by recognised agencies would be mandatory, whether GE or not. Sale of seed of spurious transgenic varieties and unregistered and uncertified seed attracts punitive provisions.

The Seed Bill, 2004, has been in cold storage on account of pressure from both the seed industry and groups with conflicting interests, all of which claim to speak for the farmers. When this Bill comes into force, there would certainly be a far greater protection for the farmer and consumer, but the Governments have adequate power to act even within the purview of the Seed Act of 1966 and consumer protection laws that are currently in force, to ensure productivity through quality and reliability of the seed. However, there are some important interventions that can be brought about.

First, among them, could be through mandatory registration and notification of GE crop varieties before a GE crop is approved by the regulatory authority for commercialisation. By the time a GE crop is approved for commercialisation, mandatory seed certification by various seed certification agencies in different states should be prepared to evaluate that particular GE crop for seed germination, seedling viability, agronomic factors and the suitability of the variety for cultivation.

Currently, there are no Seed Certification Agencies in any state that are involved in evaluation and certification of Bt cotton seeds. So, there is no guarantee that a particular variety sold in an area is suitable to be grown there.
Third, it should be ensured that the seed of a GE crop is sold at the officially determined prices through recognised private and/or public sector agencies. This will prevent reuse of those seeds.

Allegations of the existence of a spurious seed market have been made. Strict measures must be taken to root out black market in preventing the sale of illegal GE seeds.

It is also imperative to have a mechanism in place to educate farmers and guide them on the suitability of a GE variety to their land and the application of fertilisers, pesticides and irrigation methods. Extension personnel at the State or district level, officers from the Department of Agriculture and scientists from agricultural universities can be roped in to educate farmers.

The Bt cotton farmers have had no benefit of any professional advice and are left to their fate, once the seed is sold. Currently, there is a glut of Bt cotton hybrids, with the farmer being no wiser about which variety he should cultivate and how. Bt cotton is being grown in areas where it should not be grown such as on red soils, particularly as a rain fed crop. The farmer often does not plant a refugium and indulges in panic excessive insecticide application. The civil society should help the farmers with right information.

Related News

 Draft Establishment Plan for the National Biotechnology Regulatory Authority

No easy solutions to food price rise

Will GM foods end global hunger?

UGA scientists hope to reduce peanut allergies

Faso joins countries growing BT cotton

Biotechnology to determine female palmyrah plant in nursery

United States Department of Agriculture announces $28.4 million in funding for specialty crop research

Nast Confers Outstanding Young Filipino Scientists, New Academicians

From foe to friend: Researchers use salmonella as a way to administer vaccines in the body

G8 must encourage biotech cooperation for Africa

Can tomatoes carry the cure for Alzheimer's?

UA research may lead to disease shield for plants

France to propose concrete solutions to EU's GMO muddle

Science research to address food crisis

European biotech industry sets out tough agenda

GM wheat about to be planted in western Victoria

Powerful new tool to diagnose drug-resistant TB

Africa should invest in transgenic crops

Keventer plans banana processing unit in Bihar

GM crops are part of the answer to food crisis – Monsanto

Gene modified crops the key to food crisis, says scientist

Ghost of Malthus walking again


Goals & Objectives | Our Position | False Propaganda | Special Topics | Impotant Publications | Important Links | Events | News | Biosafety

© 2008 FBAE ®. All efforts have been made to make the information as accurate as possible. Any discrepancy found may be brought to the notice. Designed and Developed by: RightTurn e design